A curriculum for training, what is it intended for?

Abstract

The article presents a writing in aphorisms problematizing the curriculum and training of teachers and, in composition, it drags mathematics education and education and school and classrooms and knowledge and mathematics and and... A curriculum for training is produced as an experiment and, with it, a teleological model is assumed as a goal to be achieved a certain experimentation. A curriculum for an education that carries canonical, hegemonic, universal modes, allied to Moral, Truth, Good and Beautiful, in the undertaking of the ideal and in the control of existence. In a safe harbor, the teacher bets on a curricular truth that has in the other a childish incapable, devoid of reason, then triggers their duty to lead him to good shape. A pedagogization of the curriculum. And, with all this, in experimentation: a curriculum in what happens, training as a process, involution. Twists with what is institutionalized, demarcated and postulated. And, in composition: curriculum and teacher training in what happens. Formative processes in experimentation resist models and goals affected by signs that present themselves with the forces that establish themselves and dispute in favor of other ways of existing and knowing. Certain experiments in what happens, curriculum in what happens: curriculum happening. With invention of problems, with and in the process, with and in the middle, with what is presented and established, curriculum in experimentation.